Friday, July 25, 2014

Its History - New World Order

New World Order history - What are the basics?

The New World Order’s history and agenda has been a long time in the making. 

From divergent realms, organizations have interlocked their agendas to form a master plan that has existed for hundreds of years. 

In 1773, Mayor Amschel Rothschild met in Frankfurt, Germany with twelve of his most influential friends. 

He convinced them that by pooling their resources, they could dominate the world. 

Rothchild notified his friends that he found someone of incredible intelligence and ingenuity to head this organization -- Adam Weishaupt. 

Weishaupt, a professor of Canon law had converted to Catholicism and later  a Jesuit priest. 

At the request of the investors, he abandoned the Catholic Church. 

Through financing of the international bankers, Weishaupt created a secret society, the Order of the Illuminati, on May 1, 1776. 

The objectives of the Illuminati are the establishment of a New World Order, which aims for the :
  • Abolition of all ordered governments
  • Abolition of private property
  • Abolition of inheritance
  • Abolition of patriotism
  • Abolition of family
  • Abolition of religion
  • Creation of a world government
The bizarre inspiration for the Illuminati actually originated in the 11th and 12th centuries. 

During the Crusades, the Knights Templar excavated a site of their ancestors’ temple. 

They discovered their ancestors’ scrolls containing the ancient rituals and practices of the Egyptian mysteries. 

Having become an extremely powerful military order, they disguised themselves as Christian while guarding their involvement in Egyptian occultism and ancient symbols. 

Centuries later the Rosicrucians and Masons would use the pyramid, the Eye of Isis, and pentagram in their symbolic rituals.

The New World Order’s history reveals the Illuminati often going underground as its descendants preserved their ancient and often suspicious traditions within the inner doctrine of secret societies. 

During the Congress of Wilhemsbad (July 1782), the Order of the Illuminati united its power with Freemasonry. 

John Adams expressed strong opposition to Freemasonry and secured the presidency in 1796. 

His son, John Quincy Adams also voiced his concerns: 

(“I do conscientiously and sincerely believe that the Order of Freemasonry, if not the greatest, is one of the greatest moral and political evils under which the Union is now laboring.”) 

Concerns for the nation continued as Congress extended a 20-year charter with the Bank of the United States -- a private central bank (1816). 

Andrew Jackson vigorously opposed efforts to strengthen the grasp of a central bank over the U.S. 

He called private banks a “den of vipers . . .” and in 1832 vetoed a bill to renew the charter. 

Thomas Jefferson warned ;

(“If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all property until their children wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered.") 

The New World Order’s history and its powerful influence are still of great concern. 

Yet the concern has shifted from those who govern to those who are governed; people directly affected by the Order’s agenda. 

Over two thousand years ago, there were warnings of a one-world governmental system, a worldwide cashless monetary system and apostasy (Ezekiel 37 and 38, Daniel 7, Matthew 24). 

Will it be our generation that chooses to confront? 

Alexander Solzhenitsyn spoke of a turning point where our hierarchy of values may waiver or collapse: 

"The political crisis of today’s world and the oncoming spiritual crisis, are occurring at the same time. 

It is our generation that will have to confront them” )

(speech at AFL-CIO meeting, July 1975), as quoted in Christian Studies Center Worldview, October 1980. ) 

Globalization

What is Globalization?

Since the 1970’s, globalization has sharply accelerated its momentum towards a single-world society. 

The conventional autonomy of local societies was not eliminated, but “set aside” as common directions and options were implemented through the uniformity of practice. 

Even the trend in business, as well as government, is towards globalization. 

In his book, The Lexus and the Olive Tree, Thomas L. Friedman suggests that globalization is a forceful ongoing process of merging of the world’s markets through the application of new technology. 

The impetus is free-market capitalism, but it is not restricted to this idea.

What is globalization in business? 

Numerous industries including automotive, telecommunications, and refreshments are merging into one global marketplace. 

The manner in which these businesses conduct their day-to-day transactions is significantly altered by technology. 

Industries such as Mercedes-Benz, AT&T, and Coca Cola are staking out more territory on the global landscape. 

But the deepest roots of globalization are found in the financial institutions of The World Bank and International Monetary Fund (IMF). 

Other financial trends toward globalization include the introduction of the Euro, the “dollarization” of certain Latin American currency, and the proposal for a new North American currency, the Amero.

Herbert G. Grubel’s article, The Case for the Amero: The Economics and Politics of a North American Monetary Union, provides an excellent example of this currency alternative. 

Yet globalization is not simply about the money. 

This merging process has transformed the world through mass communications, increased ease of travel, the Internet, popular culture, and the increasingly widespread use of English as an international language. 

Countries involved in this process progress, while third world countries are left behind.

What is globalization in cultures? 

Advocates of globalization insist that free trade and free markets don’t weaken or spoil other cultures, they improve them. 

Proponents explain that trade cultivates wealth. 

Wealth frees the world’s poorest people from the daily struggle for survival, and allows them to embrace, celebrate, and share the art, music, crafts, and literature that might otherwise have been sacrificed to poverty. 

Opponents of globalization express great concern that the “mega-store” effect is occurring on a global level. 

The anti-globalization groups argue that the playing field isn’t level. 

Since free trade is partial to larger economies, the predominant western influence suppresses the cultures and traditions of the under-developed nations. 

Both sides generally agree that subsidies, tariffs, and other protectionist policies by well-developed countries against goods commonly produced in the third world (textiles, for example) stifle both culture and economic growth in the poorer nations.

Slowly and methodically institutions such as the United Nations, 
World Health Organization, and World Trade Organization are acquiring dominance. 

A global system of governing through multinational companies extends its interests on a formal and personal level. 

This is why it is crucial to evaluate the structures of cultures. 

It is imperative that consideration be given to any monolith, which subordinates -- or in most cases dismisses -- equality, then boasts about its good intentions. 

Nations and governments will not thrive if they accept an autonomous system in which the affluent and powerful execute a New World Order agenda.

The Bible speaks of material exchange and meeting the needs of others. 

The apostle Paul expressed God’s equal provision for all those in need. 

“Of course, 

I don't mean you should give so much that you suffer from having too little. 

I only mean that there should be some equality. 

Right now you have plenty and can help them. 

Then at some other time they can share with you when you need it. 

In this way, everyone's needs will be met. 

Do you remember what the Scriptures say about this? 

"Those who gathered a lot had nothing left over, and those who gathered only a little had enough" (2 Corinthians 8:13-15).